Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Skip to main content
null
Journal of Surgical Simulation
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Commentary
    • Editorial
    • Guidelines
    • Lecture notes
    • Meeting abstract
    • Meeting report
    • Oral presentation
    • Original article
    • Review article
    • Simulation centres
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Editorial policies
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • Facebook (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://jss.scholasticahq.com/feed
ISSN 2051-7726
Original article
Vol. 4, Issue 1, 2017August 23, 2017 BST

Ultrasound-guided central line placement: is a gelatine phantom a good and affordable alternative?

Bart Leenders, Stefan Bruijnen, Jan-Willem Elhof Elhof,
central venous puncturephantomhome-madetrainingultrasoundgelatine
Copyright Logoccby-nc-4.0 • https://doi.org/10.1102/2051-7726.2017.0007
Journal of Surgical Simulation
Leenders, Bart, Stefan Bruijnen, and Jan-Willem Elhof Elhof. 2017. “Ultrasound-Guided Central Line Placement: Is a Gelatine Phantom a Good and Affordable Alternative?” Journal of Surgical Simulation 4 (1): 35–40. https:/​/​doi.org/​10.1102/​2051-7726.2017.0007.

View more stats

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

cookies
cookies
cookies
Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system